CNN autism family report

I hesitate to remark on this – this article on CNN.com about a family with an uncontrollable autistic tantrum-throwing child (age 13) who has supposedly been tremendously helped by a five-day $20,000 (provided gratis) intervention. The family is no longer in “chaos”. I hope this is true, but I doubt it. I’m not going to analyze the article, other than to point out a telling paragraph :

That’s just what the Bilsons are doing: One step at a time. They have increased the amount of time that Marissa has to practice her new behavior, from a starting time of 20 minutes a day toward a goal of 60 minutes.

The reason I have a problem with this article is that it tells people who do not live with children who are incredibly disruptive that it is easy to correct the situation. I speak from experience: THAT IS ABSOLUTE  . . . excuse me for straying from AJ speak . . .  BULLSHIT.

With all due respect to my middle grandson, who is now 14, tons of time, money, hospitalizations and therapies have not altered his behavior in a way it is possible for his brother and sister to have friends over. I can’t understand it; it does not make sense. It does not respond to any “this is in your best interest” argument. I know he did not ask to be like this, but gosh o’mighty, it is hard to live with him.

I cringe at thinking of parents now who are going to have to deal with the old “Oh, you just need rules and behavior modification” and you’ll be fine. BULLSHIT. I guess I’m angry here. First parents have to deal with this type of condition in a child and now they will have people thinking they just aren’t handling it correctly.

It can get bad, very bad. Tantrums, violence, the refusal to use the bathroom – #1 and #2. Yes, I’m sorry; it’s indelicate, I know . . . but it happens. It is real for some families.

6 thoughts on “CNN autism family report”

  1. I always hate when the newest expert on the block shows up and starts saying… “if you only do this then the problem will be solved…” and it seems that each year brings a new expert. And none of them know diddly about the subject when it comes right down to it.
    I find it irritating that these experts, in the process of trying to convince you of their “rightness”, totally make you out to be a slime-ball parent for doing what you have been doing (which often is just hanging on).

    Almost worse though are the well meaning “friends” who have all the answers (although they don’t have any of the issues, they are strictly outsiders).

    Each child is different. Each one reacts differently. What works for one doesn’t work for another. Parents though need to know that they are doing the best simply by doing what they can. They don’t need to be made to feel that they are bad parents or that the answer is “easy” when it isn’t. If you notice though, many of the experts have no personal experience. They see kids in clinic, in trials. They do not live with them 24 hours a day. Huge difference.

    I’m with you on the irritation level of things like this. Although we have not been touched by autism in our family I have dealt with my share of “well-meaning idiots” (oops, friends) who have all the answers for a medical condition we do have in the family. Because they read it somewhere it must be true…. try living with it folks THEN you can talk to me.

  2. Pottermom, the directors of Autism Partnership are not exactly “the newest experts on the block.” They have been working in the field of autism for over 30 years. If you search through the psychology literature (you can do so at pubmed.com) you will find their names appearing in more than one reputable journal.
    And no, they may not have children with autism at home, but I think it’s clear they know their stuff. There is a reason it is unethical for doctors to treat their own family members. They would not be effective clinicians if they had that bias.
    FYI, there is a response posted on their blog:
    http://www.autismpartnership.blogspot.com/

  3. Pottermom, I want to thank you for your words of understanding. You can see your comment prompted another response. I approved the comment so the content could be viewed, but I want you to know I wish it had been expressed in a less edgy tone.

  4. Well knock me over with a feather. Seems my generic “newest expert on the block” and “well meaning friends” seemed to be read as “the directors of Autism Research” when I don’t believe I ever mentioned them. My point was support for the parents who are often made to feel like they are failures when they are doing their best. I suppose my ire is more for the “well-meaning friends” than the clinicians. Those well-meaning friends truly stand on the outside and judge…..
    But then as usual my wording is less than grand and clear as mud so it’s natural that a little of that goo climbs out of my post and smacks me in the face. I’ll live with it. Mud makes a lovely beauty mask.

Comments are closed.